• magpie2
Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project

Local & Regional News

Like fox guarding the henhouse

Print Email

Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Letter to the Editor Posted October 14, 2014 by Susan Cooper

To the editor:

A recent Wolf's Den column promoted the idea that the Arizona Game and Fish Department would be better able to manage the controversial wolf reintroduction program than the current federal authorities. Given the makeup of the Arizona organization, which is heavily weighted to ranchers and hunters, I would liken that to hiring the fox to guard the henhouse.

In the interest of balance, fairness and science, I am providing a website address for the education of those who are truly interested in this issue. The state of Montana has been given the control of the wolf management near Yellowstone. The reporting done by NPR is factual. I hope Mr Wolf and your readers will take the time to check out this report. It can be found at apps.npr.org.

SUSAN COOPER

Flagstaff

Wolves, antelope can co-exist

Print Email

Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Letter to the Editor Posted October 3, 2014 by Gaylene Soper

To the editor:

First, I would like to thank Mr. Wolf for keeping us apprised of the wolf conversation. I was curious about the antelope not jumping fences so I looked it up on the Arizona Game & Fish website. This is very interesting information. However, it seems to me that there a few other statistics that should be mentioned.

First of all an antelope can go as fast as 60 mph, they like wide open grasslands, and the largest weight of a male is barely 120 pounds. These three factors would make them undesirable for a family of wolves. Wolves are very economical in their movements.

Putting wolves on North Kaibab now might work better

Print Email

Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Editorial Posted August 22, 2014

When it comes to endangered Mexican gray wolves and restoring them to their historical range, be careful what you wish for.

On the one hand, Arizona Game and Fish and a coalition of ranching and sport-hunting groups wanted to expand the current recovery zone in the White Mountains not to the west or north but south to the Mexican border, where the subspecies originated and presumably would disperse.

On the other, several conservation groups urged federal wildlife managers to allow the wolves to roam as far north as the Grand Canyon and beyond, a range that once supported wolves.

So the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service split the difference in a way that makes neither group happy. Under the final plan released late last month, the wolves will get a dramatically expanded recovery range from I-40 south to the Mexican border across most of Arizona and New Mexico.

For the Game and Fish coalition, that is much too large a territory. Wolves, they say, don't mix with cows and suburbs, and sportsmen aren't too fond of competing with them for elk and deer trophies, either.

For the wolf advocates, it is far too little. The packs need much bigger tracts of true wilderness, and the North Rim is about as close to that as it gets in Arizona.

Wolf Expansion Long Overdue

Print Email

Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Letter to the Editor Posted on August 17, 2014 by Toni Prothero

To the editor:

I was glad to see coverage in the Daily Sun of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's proposed rule changes for the Mexican gray wolf reintroduction program. I was also heartened to hear that the USFWS recognizes the need for an expansion of the Mexican wolf range north of I-40 and the admittance that the proposed expansion is inadequate to their recovery.

I ask, then, why the Service is delaying the expansion of their range north of I-40 into suitable habitat, where there are few people and great numbers of elk and deer, and given the grave state of the population now and the precariousness of its survival? I am glad to hear that the Service is planning to get immediately back to work on updating the recovery plan. I am concerned, however, that the Service appears to be delaying the expansion of wolf range to the north till such a time that the plan is completed.

We have been waiting for this plan for decades and we can't wait any longer. The future and survival of the Mexican wolf is at stake. The USFWS needs to step up and do its job of protecting and conserving our native wildlife and landscapes. For the Mexican wolf, the time to do so is now, not at some future, unspecified time.

Toni Prothero

Flagstaff

Feds: No wolves to roam in Grand Canyon

Print Email

Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Posted on July 25, 2014 by Eric Betz

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is scrapping any immediate plans to allow the beleaguered Mexican gray wolf population to expand north to the Grand Canyon, as many wolf advocates and scientists have advocated in recent years.

But wolves could still roam as far north as Flagstaff, so long as they didn't cross Interstate 40.

On Thursday, the federal government published its long-awaited draft environmental impact statement, as well as revisions to proposed rule changes for the wolf population in Arizona and New Mexico. Depending on the final plan, it could be the most significant change for the Mexican gray wolf since being reintroduced to the wild following their extermination.

The proposal drastically expands the potential wolf habitat beyond its current small range along the New Mexico-Arizona border, where the animal has been limited since 1998. Under most alternatives in the proposed plan, wolves would be able to roam in New Mexico and Arizona from Interstate 40 south to the border of Mexico.

Wolves wandering north to habitat on the San Francisco Peaks or Grand Canyon National Park and beyond would be removed.

More Articles...

  1. Federal Plan Would Expand Wolf Territory in Arizona, New Mexico
  2. Let wild wolves roam in wilderness
  3. Editorial: Game and Fish Should Wait For Full Wolf EIS
  4. State: No Mexican gray wolves for Flagstaff area
  5. Guest Column: Game and Fish plan makes it easier to kill wolves
  6. Guest Opinion: Game and Fish can't be trusted with wolf program
  7. Wild Battle Rages Over Wolves, Wilderness And Politics Of Extinction
  8. Brewer vetoes bill letting ranchers kill endangered wolves on federal lands
  9. Wolves make the elk herd strong
  10. State Legislature Attempts to Limit Federal Wolf Reintroduction
  11. Alpha wolf pack sighted in Flagstaff
  12. Wolf Wanderers blog post
  13. Letter to the Editor: Thorpe's wolf story too one-sided
  14. Anti-wolf bills clear case of over-reaction
  15. House should listen to public on wolf issue
  16. Bob Thorpe trims wolf proposal
  17. Legislators work to cap gray wolves in Arizona
  18. Denying federal authority costly, inconsistent
  19. Wolves are in the crosshairs, thanks to Sen. Gail Griffin
  20. Thorpe takes up cause of Arizona ranchers losing cattle to wolves
  21. Wolf plan reignites passions
  22. National Wolf Awareness Week Event to Affect the Future of Wolves in AZ
  23. Mexican gray wolf: Where the wild things aren’t
  24. New study forecasts genetic risks to wolves in western US unless dispersal can connect isolated populations
  25. Letter to the Editor: Writer's wolf argument holds water
  26. Coconino Voices: Wolves deserve wider range
  27. Letter to the Editor: Let wolves roam more widely
  28. Editorial: Wolf expansion plan needs more details
  29. Wolves to roam toward Flagstaff?
  30. Arizona Endangered Wolves Still On The Brink
  31. Press Release: Scientists Call on Obama Administration to Keep Gray Wolves Protected Under Endangered Species Act
  32. Sedona Lecture Series focuses on Mexican Gray Wolf – April 8
  33. Howling-Good Films: Wild and Scenic Film Festival Visits Flagstaff and Benefits Local Wolf Recovery Project
  34. 15 Years of Mexican Gray Wolves: Celebrate or Sob?
  35. Arizona commission backs request to remove wolves from endangered list
  36. Wolves in Utah
  37. Attempt to strip dollars for anti-wolf lobbyist fails
  38. Why keep wolves out?
  39. Editorial: Just cry wolf
  40. Anti-wolf group likely to get second $300,000 Utah payment
  41. Legislators steering another $300,000 to anti-wolf crusade
  42. Expert: Still a Long Road Ahead for Mexican Wolf Recovery
  43. Why not control elk with wolves?
  44. Number Rose for Endangered Wolves in 2012
  45. Elk Targeted Over Aspen
  46. Grand Canyon Elk Go From Attraction To Menace
  47. Team's daily job is to manage wolves back from the brink of extinction
  48. Idea for Wolf Diversity Draws Ire
  49. We can still save the Mexican gray wolf
  50. Follow the Trail
  51. Reintroduce wolves to control bison
  52. Canyon backcountry users weigh in on access
  53. Delisting Mexican wolves sets dangerous precedent
  54. Mexican gray wolves deserve protection
  55. Wolves in wilderness part of divine splendor
  56. Coconino Voices: Wolves on rise but far away from recovery
  57. Arizona's wolves need a break
  58. Game and Fish abandoning gray wolves
  59. Mexican gray wolves due more protection
  60. Don't give wolf opponents tracking frequencies
  61. Song of the wolf long overdue here
  62. Wolf return connects us to natural world
  63. North Rim wolf revival?
  64. Environmental film festival entertains and educates
  65. Prosecute killers of wolves as criminals
  66. Mexican wolf count drops by 10 from year ago
  67. It's succeeding despite setbacks
  68. Wolf recovery now in better hands
  69. Federal agency settles wolf lawsuit
  70. Bookmans supports Arizona Coalition to save wolves!
  71. Wolves from Mexico no threat to U.S.
  72. Land of Vanishing Predators addressed at lecture
  73. Wolf recovery can succeed
  74. Survey shows support for Mexican gray wolf
  75. Poll: Most back wolf recovery
  76. Grand Canyon region can sustain wolfpacks

Action and Events

e-News Alert List

Email address:

First Name:

Last Name:


Donate Today!

Make a one-time donation to the Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project via PayPal. You do not need a PayPal account to complete this transaction. Donations may be tax-deductible.

Restoring the Balance

blah- not used

Close Panel

Login Form