Local & Regional News
Let wild wolves roam in wilderness
Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Letter to the Editor Posted on June 13, 2014 by Nicole Walker
To the editor:
The Mexican gray wolf, nearly eradicated to a population of only seven, was reintroduced to a small contiguous region in New Mexico and Arizona in 1998. Since then, the number of wolves in the region has grown to only 83 — a much, much smaller number than is feasible for genetic viability. The proposed expanded "wolf zone" is bounded by two freeways, I-10 and I-40.
If a wolf crosses beyond the boundaries of this narrow band of land, it is "relocated," which often does not go well for the wolf.
It is time to let the wolf roam further north, toward the Grand Canyon, where the people who live there and visit there do so for what the wolf represents: open spaces, ecologically sound land, wild animals and the dream of wilderness.
Wolves are not the dangerous animals conveyed by the media. They are intelligent, family-oriented creatures. A bit like us.
Even if we put all human proclivities above animals, we, by confining the wolf to one small region and preventing the wolf population from growing, effectively destroy the wildness of wilderness.
Editorial: Game and Fish Should Wait For Full Wolf EIS
Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Posted May 15, 2014, Editorial
There is no easy answer to the question: Why bring back endangered Mexican gray wolves?
The habitat in eastern Arizona and western New Mexico has been changed through logging and ranching.
The land beyond the initial release zone is full of dangerous, high-speed highways.
And there is strong criticism in the region of federal land management, undermining any federal effort to make the reintroduction program collaborative.
Any one of those factors would make the wolf project difficult; taken together, they would seem to doom it.
But federal wildlife managers have pressed on, and recently they have taken the initiative on two fronts.
State: No Mexican gray wolves for Flagstaff area
Arizona Daily Sun (Original) Posted May 11, 2014 by Eric Betz
A collection of hunting advocacy groups have signed onto a plan with the Arizona Department of Game and Fish, calling Mexican gray wolf recovery impossible in the Southwest without habitat in Mexico. The plan seeks to create a corridor that would allow wolves to head toward Mexico and disperse.
Conservationists said the state plan is not based on science and would harm efforts to re-establish wolves in the Southwest.
Game and Fish bases its plan on a contested claim that 90 percent of the Mexican gray wolf historical range lies south of the U.S. border. The state plan would restrict habitat north of the border to areas it defines as historical habitat.
The state agency would also keep wolves from reaching Flagstaff and all areas west of Payson because they have a poor "prey base" and are too heavily populated with humans. The plan says that the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, as well as Colorado and Utah, should not be used because they are outside the historical range of the wolf.
But the state's idea that Mexican wolves should stay in a restricted historical region, including south of Interstate 40, contrasts with a scientific research as well as a draft recovery plan leaked from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service several years ago.
Researchers studying wolf genetics at the University of California Los Angeles found that northern gray wolves wandered as far south as Arizona and Mexican wolves roamed north in Utah and Colorado. Their genetics were mixed and biologists say they can't rule out that Mexican gray wolves might have originally come south from Canada.
Guest Column: Game and Fish plan makes it easier to kill wolves
Arizona Republic (Original) Posted May 7, 2014 by Sandy Bahr
Bahr: 'Extinction alternative' shows how out of touch the department is with Arizonans
Larry Voyles' column on Monday, "Mexican wolf proposal offers needed balance," is just one example of how the Arizona Game and Fish Department and its commission are out of step with wildlife conservation and the vast majority of the public.
The proposal Game and Fish calls the "cooperating agencies alternative" is a collection of previously discarded policies that failed to promote wolf recovery in the past and will not promote wolf recovery in the future. It will keep wolves from truly regaining their role in supporting healthy ecosystems and will surely contribute to their demise, if not a second extinction in the wild.
Guest Opinion: Game and Fish can't be trusted with wolf program
Arizona Daily Star (Original) Posted April 30, 2014 by Tim Steller
Arizona's Game and Fish commissioners want you to trust them with the Mexican gray wolf recovery program. Again.
From 2003 through 2009, Arizona Game and Fish led the program through a broader group called the Adaptive Management Oversight Committee. During those years, the known wolf population in eastern Arizona and western New Mexico went from 55 to 42.
Then, in 2009, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was forced, through a lawsuit settlement, to take greater control of the program. The settlement also voided a rule that mandated killing wolves that preyed on livestock three times within any 365-day period.
From 2010 to 2013, the wolf population in the area rose from 50 to 83.
- Wild Battle Rages Over Wolves, Wilderness And Politics Of Extinction
- Brewer vetoes bill letting ranchers kill endangered wolves on federal lands
- Wolves make the elk herd strong
- State Legislature Attempts to Limit Federal Wolf Reintroduction
- Alpha wolf pack sighted in Flagstaff
- Wolf Wanderers blog post
- Letter to the Editor: Thorpe's wolf story too one-sided
- Anti-wolf bills clear case of over-reaction
- House should listen to public on wolf issue
- Bob Thorpe trims wolf proposal
- Legislators work to cap gray wolves in Arizona
- Denying federal authority costly, inconsistent
- Wolves are in the crosshairs, thanks to Sen. Gail Griffin
- Thorpe takes up cause of Arizona ranchers losing cattle to wolves
- Wolf plan reignites passions
- National Wolf Awareness Week Event to Affect the Future of Wolves in AZ
- Mexican gray wolf: Where the wild things aren’t
- New study forecasts genetic risks to wolves in western US unless dispersal can connect isolated populations
- Letter to the Editor: Writer's wolf argument holds water
- Coconino Voices: Wolves deserve wider range
- Letter to the Editor: Let wolves roam more widely
- Editorial: Wolf expansion plan needs more details
- Wolves to roam toward Flagstaff?
- Arizona Endangered Wolves Still On The Brink
- Press Release: Scientists Call on Obama Administration to Keep Gray Wolves Protected Under Endangered Species Act
- Sedona Lecture Series focuses on Mexican Gray Wolf – April 8
- Howling-Good Films: Wild and Scenic Film Festival Visits Flagstaff and Benefits Local Wolf Recovery Project
- 15 Years of Mexican Gray Wolves: Celebrate or Sob?
- Arizona commission backs request to remove wolves from endangered list
- Wolves in Utah
- Attempt to strip dollars for anti-wolf lobbyist fails
- Why keep wolves out?
- Editorial: Just cry wolf
- Anti-wolf group likely to get second $300,000 Utah payment
- Legislators steering another $300,000 to anti-wolf crusade
- Expert: Still a Long Road Ahead for Mexican Wolf Recovery
- Why not control elk with wolves?
- Number Rose for Endangered Wolves in 2012
- Elk Targeted Over Aspen
- Grand Canyon Elk Go From Attraction To Menace
- Team's daily job is to manage wolves back from the brink of extinction
- Idea for Wolf Diversity Draws Ire
- We can still save the Mexican gray wolf
- Follow the Trail
- Reintroduce wolves to control bison
- Canyon backcountry users weigh in on access
- Delisting Mexican wolves sets dangerous precedent
- Mexican gray wolves deserve protection
- Wolves in wilderness part of divine splendor
- Coconino Voices: Wolves on rise but far away from recovery
- Arizona's wolves need a break
- Game and Fish abandoning gray wolves
- Mexican gray wolves due more protection
- Don't give wolf opponents tracking frequencies
- Song of the wolf long overdue here
- Wolf return connects us to natural world
- North Rim wolf revival?
- Environmental film festival entertains and educates
- Prosecute killers of wolves as criminals
- Mexican wolf count drops by 10 from year ago
- It's succeeding despite setbacks
- Wolf recovery now in better hands
- Federal agency settles wolf lawsuit
- Bookmans supports Arizona Coalition to save wolves!
- Wolves from Mexico no threat to U.S.
- Land of Vanishing Predators addressed at lecture
- Wolf recovery can succeed
- Survey shows support for Mexican gray wolf
- Poll: Most back wolf recovery
- Grand Canyon region can sustain wolfpacks